National Association of State Textbook Adminstrators

NASTA 2008 Summer Reports



California

Submitted by
Tom Adams
Director, Curriculum Frameworks

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption

Mathematics instructional materials for K-8 were adopted in November 2007. Three types of programs were adopted: basic grade level materials, intervention materials for grades 4-7, and algebra readiness. The list of adopted materials is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ma/im/.

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption

Currently, we are in the midst of the Reading-Language Arts (RLA)/English Language Development (ELD) instructional materials adoption for K-8. There are five types of programs: basic RLA grade level materials, basic grade level with ELD, primary language (all submissions were in Spanish), intervention for struggling readers, and intervention for English learners. The list of submitted program is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/rl/im/.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials

The Budget is not final but the proposed amount is $390 million.

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year

The current fiscal crisis has undercut funding for instructional materials and will result in a 10% cut in state operations.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials

California adopted a new set of regulations that govern the development of curriculum frameworks and instructional materials adoptions. The adoption of new regulations was done under the mandate of the court case of Hinda American Foundation v. State Board of Education. The new regulations are attached. In addition, the California State Board of Education has decided to test all grade 8 students in Algebra by spring 2011. Currently, 52% of CA's grade 8 students are in Algebra, and 48% are in other math courses. The students in non-Algebra courses will need instructional materials by school year 2010-2011. Lastly, California adopted health standards in March 2008 and these will be the basis for the development of the curriculum framework and instructional materials.

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

California will be adopting standards for foreign language in 2009. These standards will be the basis for the curriculum framework and future adoptions.
California has already begun the development of the history-social science and science frameworks with work to be completed by May 2010 and May 2011, respectively.

~ ~ ~ ~

Florida

Submitted by
Charlie Carraway
Director, Instructional Materials and Library Media Services

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption

Florida’s 2007-2008 adoption consisted of K-5(6) Comprehensive Core Reading, 6-8 Developmental Reading, K-12 Comprehensive Intervention Reading, and K-12 Supplemental Intervention Reading with a total of 114 bids submitted in May of 2007. Of those 114 submitted bids, 89 were officially adopted.

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption

The 2008-2009 call is for 6-12 Literature, K-12 Language Arts, Writing, and Communication Skills, K-12 English for Speakers of Other Languages, and K-12 Music.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials

The 2008 Legislature funded Instructional Materials for the 2008-2009 academic year at 259,551,440, which includes funding for the Reading adoption, but it also includes funds for Library Media and Science Lab Materials and Equipment.

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials

Florida has faced a few challenges in the last twelve to eighteen months because of Legislative issues and internal leadership changes that have led to new policies. First, Florida is revising the Sunshine State Standards, and the alignment of the revision process to the adoption cycle has proven to be a challenge. At one point there was even consideration of a postponement of the literature and language arts adoption because the revision of those standards would not be completed in time. Second, as most states, Florida has felt the impact of the economic crisis, and the 2008 Legislature reduced the instructional materials management budget by 8.6%. This budget funds the training of our state committees and the Fall deliberation meetings at which the committees make their final decisions. Additionally, in February 2008, new leadership within the Department requested that our office find an alternative means for the June training of the state committees in order to realize a cost savings to the State.

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

We continue to face challenges as standards revisions are proposed that could affect the adoption cycle.
  Adoption Year    Effective Date Of Contract    Length Of Contract    Subject Areas  
2009-2010April 1, 20106 yrMathematics K-12
  6 yrMarketing/Diversified Ed 9-12
  6 yr1Computer Education K-51
  6 yr1Computer Ed/ Business Tech Ed 6-121
  6 yr1Technology Education 6-121
    
2010-2011April 1, 20116 yrScience K-12
  6 yrAgriscience & Natural Resources 6-12
  4 yrSpeech/Drama/Journalism/Humanities
    
2011-2012April 1, 20126 yrSocial Studies K-12
  6 yrDriver Education & Traffic Safety 9-12
  6 yrPhysical Education K-12
  6 yrHealth Education K-12
    
2012-2013April 1, 20136 yr2Computer Ed/ Business Tech Ed 6-122
  6 yr2Computer Education K-52
  6 yr2Technology Ed 6-122
  6 yrIndustrial Ed 9-12
  6 yrFamily & Consumer Sciences 6-12
  6 yrHealth Sciences Education 6-12
  6 yrVisual Arts K-12
  6 yrWorld Languages K-12
    
2013-2014April 1, 20146 yrReading K-12
    
2014-2015April 1, 20156 yrESOL K-12
  6 yrLanguage Arts K-12
  6 yrSpeech/Drama/Journalism/Humanities
  6 yrLiterature 6-12
  6 yrMusic K-12


1This is a full adoption year.

2This is an interim adoption year.

~ ~ ~ ~

Idaho

Submitted by
Val Fenske
Curricular Materials Coordinator

Idaho held a special review session in April to look at Evidence Based Intervention Math programs for meeting Idaho’s Math Initiative needs. Committee recommendations went to the State Board of Education in June. For information related to Idaho math Initiative: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/math/math_initiative.htm/.

As part of the Math Initiative, Idaho has incorporated National Council for Teachers of Mathematics criteria into our evaluation process. This evaluation tool ensure Idaho’s math materials align to the national standards as well as to our own state standards. This evaluation tool is available through our web page: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/evaluation_forms.htm.

In June, Idaho reviewed curricular materials in the content areas of Mathematics, Evidence Based Mathematics, Professional Technical Education, Language Arts Part I: Reading, and Research Based Reading. Annual adoption continues for Computer Applications and Limited English Proficiency. Our committee recommendations go before the State Board of Education in August.

Idaho continues to provide specific funding to school districts for purchasing curricular materials, applicable to both print and non-print state approved instructional materials. Idaho Legislators approved $9.95 million under House Bill No. 670, Section 6. The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall determine the formulas and methodologies for the distribution of funds based upon average daily attendance numbers. http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/classroom_enhancement/textbooks.htm

To meet Idaho Statute 33-118A, Idaho continues to move toward housing electronic versions of textbooks versus print editions at the State Department of Education’s Curriculum & Technology Center. Publishers will be asked to submit electronic editions when available.. Print editions will continue to be required for the review process and for each of our seven regional centers.

In 2009 Idaho will be reviewing Drivers Education, Physical Education, Health, and Humanities in the categories of Interdisciplinary, World Languages, Dance, Music, Drama/Theatre, and Art. Our adoption schedule is available: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/cm_docs/adoptionschedule.pdf. Standards for drivers education and humanities are currently under revision. The revised standards should be available after the first of the year.

Our caravan continues to be in October. For dates and additional information, please refer to our website: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/cm_docs/caravan.pdf.

Idaho’s Curricular materials homepage: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/ contains a listing of all state approved curricular materials, adoption process statutes, upcoming events, adoption process deadlines as well as publisher contact information. Our website continues to be revised, please contact me if have difficulty in locating necessary information.

~ ~ ~ ~

Indiana

Submitted by
Linda Dierstein
Textbook Adoption Coordinator

In Indiana we are in the middle of our Social Studies adoption. We are adopting in all areas for grades 1-12.

The publishers submitted their bids and samples on June 19. The state reviewers met earlier in July in Indianapolis and gave their recommendations to the Advisory Committee on Textbook Adoptions as to whether the books were satisfactory or unsatisfactory for adoption. The advisors will consider their recommendations and receive public input through our public hearings. They will then vote at their meeting on September 3 and the State Board of Education will approve their recommendations in the afternoon of September 3.

The textbook caravan will be held in January and February. Our caravan is planned by the publishers and visits about 9 sites around the state. Publishers whose material is not on the adoption list may attend the caravan and display their material, but they are not given a presentation time.

Our next adoption area is Mathematics. The bids and samples for the social studies materials will be due around June 18, 2009. As a reminder to publishers, we accept final copy only.

As far as funding, Indiana is a textbook rental state. This means that the parents of the students pay a "textbook rental fee" each year and we have no state funding for textbooks except for children on the free and reduced lunch program.

~ ~ ~ ~

Louisiana

Submitted by
Marcie Coupel
Louisiana Department of Education

      
I.Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption: 2007-2008 Reading & Literature
 A.Caravan participation has continued to increase annually since 2002 (Language Arts, 638 registered). This year for Reading/Literature, 2,100 were registered.
      
 B.Estimated cost of books LEAs’ purchased: At least $45 million (Reading $25,700,00 and Literature $20,000,000)
      
II.Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
 A.2008-2009 Language Arts
      
 B.2009-2010 Career and Technical Education
   i.Categories /Subjects for adoption
     a. Agriscience
     b. Business Education
     c. Marketing
     d. Family and Consumer Sciences
     e. Health Occupations
     f. Technology Education
     g. Trade & Industrial
      
III.Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
 A.Public Schools: We do not have a per-pupil allocation for the public schools. The State and local funding for approved textbooks is generated through the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) funding formula. The formula determines the minimum cost of total operational expenditures for each school system. Districts receive the state board's share as part of a monthly allotment with provision for local flexibility that allows funds to be used as deemed appropriate by school systems.
      
 B.Nonpublic Schools: Each nonpublic school receives a textbook allocation based on the number of K-12 nonpublic students enrolled in the SBESE and Brumfield-Dodd approved nonpublic schools. Reimbursements made to local school districts for purchases of nonsectarian books for nonpublic school students at the rate of $27.02 per student.
      
IV.Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
 A.State Superintendent Paul G. Pastorek’s focus is preparing Louisiana’s children to succeed and compete on a national as well as international level during the 21st century.
      
 B.Our Vision is to create a world-class education system for all students in Louisiana. To achieve this vision, the Superintendent is focusing state efforts on these 3 missions and 5 initiatives:
   Missions:
  • Increase academic achievement for all
  • Eliminate the achievement gap
  • Prepare students to be effective citizens
   Initiatives:
  • Mastery of Literacy and Numeracy by the 4th grade
  • High School Redesign
  • Saving Failing Schools
  • Career and Technical Education
  • Early Childhood Education
  • Paired Schools (pairing low performing schools with high-poverty, high-performing schools)
 C.Realignment at the Department
   i.We have been assigned to a new division: Division of Curriculum Standards. (We will actually be working in the same division with content staff.)
   ii.The Division Director is Nancy Beben.
   iii.The Division is composed of three sections: Ancillary Resources Section, Elementary Standards (PreK-4), and Secondary Standards (5-12).
      
 D.Special call for K-12 Reading Intervention Programs Recommended List
   i.Currently in Bulletin 1903, Regulations and Guidelines for Implementation of the Louisiana Law for the Education of Dyslexic Students, Louisiana has a recommended list of Multisensory Structured Language Programs for Students identified with Characteristics of Dyslexia.
   ii.The Department has established a task force that is currently revising the bulletin and is making plans to review intervention, remediation, and assessment products with the expectation of updating this recommended list. The task force intends to announce a special call for these programs. Publishers who are interested in being included in any invitation should send an email to the Textbooks Staff.
      
 E.New Bid Submission System - We have implemented a new ftp (File Transfer Protocol) system for bid submissions. It is helpful because the documents were overloading our email systems. This system houses the electronic files pertaining to bids, affidavits, correlations, and forms Bs’, and provides easy, ongoing access to our staff as well as the publishers.
      
 F.Book Depository Status
   i.In May we anticipate announcing an RFP for the state Book Depository, which will serve in a Preferred Status.
   ii.Our policy allows districts to purchase from the Book Depository or directly from the publishers.
   iii.We are the process of expanding the current ordering system to include a new feature which will include alternate text formats, thereby providing districts with a single point of entry for ordering all student materials. This provision is now in development stages in the current depository agreement.
   iv.The new RFP will include these new features and specifications, which will provide for a state-of-the-art, state-wide, centralized ordering system to include alternate text formats (i.e. Braille, Audio, Large Print, and Digital).
      
 G.Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) Consortium/Project.
   i.The Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) Consortium is comprised of 15 States that are committed to organizational restructuring to increase the quality, availability, and timeliness of accessible educational materials. The Consortium, coordinated by CAST, consists of Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
   ii.The primary goal of the AIM Consortium is to improve academic outcomes for elementary and secondary school students with disabilities, focusing on the key element of timely and appropriate access to instructional materials for students with print disabilities.
   iii.AIM Period of Performance: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2009
   iv.Focused State Activities budget is $ 166,666.00, and Louisiana’s goals are:
     1. Develop data management and tracking systems for administering NIMAS files and delivering instructional materials in accessible formats.
     2. Develop and implement a plan for providing professional development designed to improve the capacity of LEAs to understand the provisions of Section 300.172 of Part B of IDEA 2004; identify students with print disabilities; determine which specialized formats and technology tools are appropriate for student with print disabilities; and acquire specialized formats and supporting tools to students with print disabilities.
     3. Improve States' communications regarding accessible instructional materials and NIMAS by developing talking points and a core message for sharing with others.
      
V.Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
 A.We are in the process of proposing language which would revise Bulletin 1794- State Textbook Adoption Policy & Procedure Manual regarding Free Materials. All Free Materials, Ancillary, and Basal materials will be limited to instructional materials. Instructional Materials are limited to items having intellectual content that by design assist in the instruction of a subject or course. Instructional Materials may be transmitted via “storage mechanisms” (such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, flash drives, etc.), but “delivery mechanisms” (such as iPods, laptops, whiteboards, etc.) shall not be included in the adopted materials. Instructional Materials may be available in bound, unbound, bundled or package form and may consist of hardbound or softbound textbooks, consumables, manipulatives, electronic media, and computer courseware or software. Instructional Materials do not include electronic or computer hardware even if such hardware is bundled with software or other electronic media, nor does it include equipment or supplies. We plan to bring these recommended revisions to the State Board meeting in August.
      
V.Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)
The State K-12 Textbook Adoption Cycle
2010-2011: Science , Health and Physical Education & Computer Education2011-2012: Foreign Language, Handwriting, Music & Fine Arts 2012-2013: Mathematics

~ ~ ~ ~

Mississippi

Submitted by
Kim Esco-Collins, Director
Textbook Procurement & Adoption


I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption
  • Driver’s Education 9-12
  • Business and Technology Education K-12
  • Mathematics
II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
  • Foreign Language
  • Vocational Education
  • Business & Computer
  • Cooperative Education
  • Health Education
  • Marketing Education
  • Trade & Industry
  • Technology Education
III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
  • Based on MAEP Funds , but school districts combined are required to spend $21,000,000.00.
IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
  • Value of the Textbook Office – Why is it important for Mississippi to be an adoption state?
V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
  • Handbook Revision
  • Delay of Curriculum Framework
VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

MISSISSIPPI
FUTURE ANNUAL ADOPTIONS

The Mississippi Department of Education reserves the right to make changes.
Subject Areas To Be AdoptedYear of
Adoption
Year Contract
Becomes Effective
on July 1
Fiscal
Year(s) of
Funding
Agriculture (Vocational)
Business Technology (Vocational)
Cooperative Education (Vocational)
Health Education (Vocational)
Marketing Education (Vocational)
Trade & Industrial Education (Vocational)
Technology Education (Vocational)
Foreign Language
200820092010
Science
*High School Redesign Courses
(Vocational)
200920102011
Literature
Reading
201020112012
Social Studies
Visual & Performing Arts
201120122013
Comprehensive Health
Dictionaries
English Language Arts
Handwriting
Spelling
Physical Education
Family & Consumer Sciences (Vocational)
201220132014
Business & Technology Education
Driver Education
Mathematics
201320142015

~ ~ ~ ~

New Mexico

Submitted by
Larry Bemesderfer
Education Administrator

I. Subject Areas of Last Year’s Adoption
Last year’s adoption was for Career Education & Technology, Adult Basic Education, and Driver Education.

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year’s Adoption
This/next year’s adoption is for Grades 9-12 Language Arts/Reading, Grades 9-12 Core Reading Interventions, and Grades 9-12 Modern, Classical and Native Languages.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
1) The 2007-08 allocation was $37,200,000. The library materials allocation was $2,000,000.
2) The 2008-09 allocation is $39,020,000. The library materials allocation is $2,000,000.


IV. Challenges/Issues Faced This Year
1) Dual Credit programs
     a) NM State Legislature passed a new graduation requirement that each student have at least one dual credit/online course.
     b) Projecting funding needed for instructional materials is difficult:
          i) Do we fund for all dual credit courses a student takes? If so, how do we get that information? Do we limit the funding one course per student?
          ii) College texts are frequently changed – how do we know costs in advance?
          iii) What factors will be used to determine allocations? Student population? High School student population? Prior year’s enrollment in dual credit courses? Do we take into consideration differing cost structures at different college bookstores?
     c) Oversight of expenditures
          i) Funding is on a reimbursement basis. What procedures will work for verification of purchases and payment to districts?
          ii) Addition of a $2.5 million fund to oversee strains staff capacity.
2) Overall level of funding is not adequate to meet the needs of the student population. Funding is in the area of $85-$90 per student; last year, the Instructional Material Bureau calculated that to provide a complete set of an adopted text would require approximately $145 per student.
3) Funding of instructional materials for students attending private schools.
     a) Quality of bookkeeping varies greatly.
     b) Method of payment is direct from PED to Depository - completely different from system for public, charter, state-supported, and ABE schools.
4) Alignment of Adoption Review scoring rubrics with State Standards, Benchmarks, and Performance Indicators.
     a) Lack of understanding in content bureaus about the role they play in the process.
     b) Long adoption cycle intervals and high departmental turnover requires a continual re-education process. Because it is not a continuing process/presence in individual bureaus, it is treated as “not our work” and a back-burner process to be done at the last minute by available people rather than qualified people.
     c) Current standards are being revised, but we must use existing standards for the adoption review.
5) The creation of the State Cyber Academy, intended to provide distance learning courses for grades six through twelve, has brought into sharper focus the question of how to evaluate online courses.
     a) We conducted a pilot adoption review of one complete online learning system during the first half of 2008.
     b) The pilot required a review of the entire high school curriculum; the bureau developed a scoring rubric for each of 16 different courses based on the published state standards and benchmarks and also including pedagogy elements based on national standards.
     c) To conduct the review, we enlisted the assistance of an online academy run by one of New Mexico’s districts. The instructors at the school were familiar with the program being reviewed and provided valuable information about the review process as well as conducting the actual reviews.
     d) In this case, every course in the curriculum was approved for adoption.
     e) Due to time and resource constraints, the Instructional Material Bureau concluded that courses with direct online instruction are too multifaceted to be reviewed as instructional materials.
6) However, digital instructional material (other than material that includes direct instruction) is reviewed by Instructional Material Bureau.
     a) Digital material can present problems when reviewers are trying to find portions cited as demonstrating alignment. For example, if the material includes video, the evidentiary piece may be somewhere in the video; or the evidentiary piece may be embedded in an interactive segment of software.
     b) Not all digital material includes the hard copy material needed to conduct the review. This is not necessarily a hard copy of the material itself, but it could be a course guide, teacher’s planning manual, etc.
     c) Digital material that is online may require the reviewer to log in to review the course material. Our experience tells us that unless the reviewer is already familiar with the material this is a tremendously time-consuming (and therefore expensive) process.
     d) The cost of reviews for textbooks cannot be applied to digital material. The publisher pays for a review that results in the sale of a book that is expected to last for six years, while the software/digital publisher pays the same price for material that may require annual per-student licensing or some other arrangement. Digital material introduces a variety of pricing arrangements, and reviewing the material should probably reflect these differences.
     e) One of the appeals of digital material is the ability to update frequently. Our current limitation on updates of adopted material needs to be revised to reflect current technology.
7) Statewide Virtual Library
     a) To make more efficient use of a small library fund.
     b) Instead of receiving a small library allocation, every school will have access to a very high quality e-library.
     c) Proposal required, survey of infrastructure, operating plan, budget.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
1) The new requirement for students entering the ninth grade beginning in the 2009-2010 school year is that “at least one of the units required for graduation shall be earned as an advanced placement or honors course, a dual-credit course offered in cooperation with an institution of higher education or a distance learning course.” The impact of this change is discussed above.
2) The state legislature approved a bill requiring a complete alignment of mathematics curriculum within each district (by grade levels). This new requirement raises several questions:
     a) Can curriculum be aligned if materials are not aligned?
     b) If using the same publisher for all math materials, does that mean that the curriculum is aligned?
     c) How will compliance be monitored? In particular, how will the alignment of the instructional materials be monitored?

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle

Adoption ScheduleRequest for
Proposal
Historic
Adoption Year
Career Tech, Adult Basic and Driver Ed   December 2006      August 1, 2007   
9-12 Language Arts/Reading, CORE Reading Intervention,
Modern, Classical and Native Languages
   August 2007       August 1, 2008   
K-8 Language Arts/Reading, CORE Reading Intervention,
Modern, Classical and Native Languages
August
2008
   2009   
Social Studies, Library/Reference, NM Native American Art and
Culture
August
2009
   2010   
Science, Health, and Physical Education August
2010
   2011   
Mathematics and the Arts (Music, Theatre, Dance, Art) August
2011
   2012   

~ ~ ~ ~

Oklahoma

Submitted by
Paige Pierce-Phillips
Director, Instructional Materials

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption

Last year, Oklahoma adopted Reading and Literature, K-12.

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption

Currently, the State Textbook Committee is reviewing materials for Foreign Languages, Health, Vocational Education, Computer Education, Instructional Technology, and Personal Financial Literacy. Next year, the State Textbook Committee will consider bids in K-12 Mathematics.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials

The allocation for the Reading and Literature adoption was $33,000,000, which is about $55 per student. Because of the budget shortfalls due to less than expected lottery income, and high fuel and operating costs, this amount does not reflect an increase from previous years.

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year

Funding is, as always, the biggest problem we have faced this year.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials

Our policy has changed regarding instructional materials descriptions in the bid. For example, if a company bids materials in kit form, they must be very specific about everything contained in that kit. If a kit contains manipulatives, the bid should not just state “manipulatives” as the description. The State Textbook Committee wants to know specifically what manipulatives are in the kit, and how many of each type there are. This will be tedious for the contract representatives, but it will aid us in assuring that there are no omissions from, nor additions to the final bid. Once the bids arrive in my office, I will work with publishers to ensure that all bids are sufficient. If something is not clear, I will require that the company correct the bid form before the final vote in November.

Another change is that correlations may now be submitted in electronic format only. Publishers may either provide access to the correlations via the Internet, or they may send a CD-rom containing the correlations.

V. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

None.

~ ~ ~ ~

Oregon

Submitted by
Drew Hinds
Oregon Department of Education

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption

In October 2007 the Oregon State Board of Education adopted Health Education and Physical Education Instructional Materials. The process followed traditional procedures set forth by statute and administrative rule.

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption

Instructional materials criteria have been developed for the evaluation of ‘K-8 Mathematics’ this summer with proposed adoption in October resulting in the district adoption, purchase and disbursement to classrooms by September 2009.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials

In 2007 Oregon’s Governor and Legislature made education funding a priority and in addition to approving the proposed education budget, provided millions in school improvement funding tied to key performance measures for education. While districts are not required by law to earmark money for instructional materials many school districts do because they are required by law to annually adopt materials from the state approved list, independently adopt using the same criteria and process or postpone the adoption for up to one year. Department staff have participated in some state-wide review and audits of district standards, including instructional materials adoption, along side monitoring visits required by No Child Left Behind.

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year

With the retirement of Ray Lindley, past ODE Director and NASTA President, some institutional knowledge has been lost. However, the staff transition has been supported by Sue Parton who continues to handle bids, contracts, and facility planning and Jerry Rockwood from the Northwest Textbook Depository. The postponement secondary mathematics standards, implementation of core standards, minor issues regarding the state viewing site and the lack of an official caravan for health and physical education materials created challenges this past year but it is our pleasure to report to you that Oregon’s process is strong.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials

Ray will continue to support efforts to revise existing administrative rules and procedures to continue streamlining Oregon’s process. This will include proposed changes to the provisions for the adoption of criteria and materials by reference instead of annual changes to the law and efforts to strengthen the review process, substitution policies and technical standards to facilitate the involvement of both print and digital publishers.

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

As mentioned above, in January Oregon postponed the adoption of standards and materials for ‘Secondary Mathematics’ so those materials will be bid, evaluated, and adopted in 2008-09 with ‘K-12 Science’ materials. Additional science and math requirements imbedded in the New Oregon Diploma have created a great amount of interest in secondary mathematics and science. New K-12 Science and Secondary Math standards are already under review and drafts are available at the Department web page http://www.ode.state.or.us/go/InstructionalMaterials.

~ ~ ~ ~

South Carolina

Submitted by
Kriss Stewart
SC Instructional Materials Adoption Program

I.   Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption

2007 Adoption Cycle
Business, Management, and Administration
  • Computer Applications
  • Digital Input Technologies
  • Introduction to Computers in Business
  • Keyboarding, 7–12
  • Administrative Support Technology
  • Virtual Enterprise
Career Education

Education and Training
  • Early Childhood Education
Foreign Languages
  • French includes Readers
  • Latin includes Readers
  • Spanish includes Readers
Hospitality and Tourism
  • Culinary Arts
Human Services
  • Food Science and Dietetics
Information Technology
  • Computer Service Technology 1, 2, 3, and 4
  • Information Technology Foundations
  • Networking 1, 2
Performing Arts, K–12
  • Advanced Placement Music Theory
  • Chorus, 6–12
  • Dance, K–12
  • Drama
  • Instrumental Music, 6–12
  • Music Appreciation, 9–12
  • Music, K–8
Science, 9–12
  • Biology—1, 2, Advanced Placement, and Applied
  • Chemistry—1, 2, Advanced Placement and Applied
  • Physical Science
  • Physics—Advanced Placement Physics and Applied
Social Studies, 9–12
  • Advanced Placement European History
  • Advanced Placement Human Geography
  • Law Related Education
Visual Arts, K–12
  • Advanced Placement Art History
  • Advanced Placement Art Studio/Drawing
  • Art, K–12
  • Art Appreciation, 6–12
II.   Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption

2008 Adoption Cycle
Business, Management, and Administration
  • Accounting 1, 2
  • Personal Finance (formerly known as Financial Management)
  • Professional and Leadership Development
  • Web Page Design (Dreamweaver)
Engineering/Industrial Technology Education
  • Industrial Technology Education 1, 2, 3
Finance
  • Business Finance
  • Banking and Investments
  • Insurance
Information Technology
  • Digital Imaging 1, 2
  • Animated Computer Production
Language Arts, Secondary
  • Advanced Composition
  • English Language Arts, Grades 9–12
  • English Language and Composition, Advanced Placement
  • English Literature and Composition, Advanced Placement
  • Journalism
  • Speech
Law, Public Safety, Corrections, and Security
  • Emergency and Fire Management Services
  • Law Enforcement Services (Criminal Justice and Forensic Science)
Marketing, Sales, and Service
  • Advertising
  • Fashion Design and Apparel Construction
  • Interior Design
  • Merchandising
  • Global Markets
  • Sports and Entertainment Marketing 2
Mathematics, Elementary and Middle
  • Mathematics, Grades K–5
  • Mathematics, Grades 6–8
Modern and Classical Languages
  • Chinese
  • German
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
  • Pre-Engineering
III.   Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
General Fund   $26,498,804
EIA Fund   $21,923,259
Non-Recurring   $3,331,413
IV.   Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
The most challenging part of the current adoption is funding materials for the 2008–09 school year. The General Assembly appropriates funds from the General Funds and Education Improvement Act (EIA) which enables the State Department of Education to fund instructional materials by subject areas from the current adoption. This year the school orders for materials have exceeded the General Fund and EIA by at least eight million. In addition, Non-Recurring funds will not be available until November 2008.
V.   Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
At the request of the State Board of Education, the Department is reviewing the time line of instructional materials adoption procedures and events and will make changes as needed.
VI.   Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)

Tentative Adoption Areas for 2009 Cycle
AP Computer Science
Business Administration Major
  • Business Communication
  • Business Computer Mathematics
  • Business Law
  • Business Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • International Business and Marketing
  • Introduction to Business and Marketing
Business/Marketing – Computer Programming
  • Computer Programming 1, 2 (includes Orcale SQL and Orcale PL-SQL)
Business/Marketing – Computer Technology
  • Business and Marketing Internet Application
  • Integrated Business Applications
  • Desktop Publishing
  • E-Business
  • Document Processing
Graphic Communication
Language Arts, K–5
Mathematics, 9–12
  • Algebra 1, 2
  • Geometry
  • Mathematics for the Technologies 1, 2, 3
Physical Education
Science, 9–12
  • Astronomy
  • Earth Science
  • Environmental Science
  • Environmental Science, Advanced Placement
  • Marine Science
  • Anatomy/Physiology
Social Studies, 9–12
  • Citizenship-Civil
  • Psychology
  • AP Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Economics
  • Economics, Advanced Placement

~ ~ ~ ~

Texas

Submitted by
John Lopez

Acting Managing Director
Instructional Materials and Educational Technology
Texas Education Agency

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption
II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
Adoption Cycle link http://www.tea.state.tx.us/textbooks/adoptprocess/index.html.

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
Proclamations for Instructional Materials (includes funding) link http://www.tea.state.tx.us/textbooks/proclamations/index.html.

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year Length of time to rewrite the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Reading Language Arts has shortened the timeline for publishers to develop products for our next Proclamation.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
HB 188, passed during our last legislative session, required Texas to plan for a midcycle review process.

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)
Adoption Cycle link http://www.tea.state.tx.us/textbooks/adoptprocess/index.html.

~ ~ ~ ~

West Virginia

Submitted by
Alma Simpson
Coordinator, Instructional Resources

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption
  • English Language Arts (Composition, Grammar, Handwriting, Journalism and Speech K-12)
  • Music (K-12)
  • Visual Art (K-12)

II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
  • World Languages
  • Driver Education
  • Dance
  • Theatre

III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
  • Legislative funds based on county tax base
  • County Levies

IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
  • The learning curve of being new to the position was a challenge
  • Locating people to review world languages, especially Chinese
  • Frustration felt by many counties who adopted an integrated reading program during the preceding year only to discover they had to request a waiver in order to use that material for the English Language Arts adoption.
  • The charge given me by the WV State Board to transition away from traditional text to digital content because of West Virginia’s focus on 21st Century educational practices.

V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
  • None
A requested change to start requiring a fee to make bids was approved by the House but never got out of committee in the Senate. We will make this request again this year.

VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)
  • Mathematics K-12 (2010-2016)
  • Family and consumer Science (2010-2015)*
  • Vocational Agriculture (2010-2015)*
*This was a change from last year because new standards were being developed.

~ ~ ~ ~


NASTA Homepage