
NASTA 2008 Summer Reports
CaliforniaSubmitted by | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adoption Year | Effective Date Of Contract | Length Of Contract | Subject Areas |
| 2009-2010 | April 1, 2010 | 6 yr | Mathematics K-12 |
| 6 yr | Marketing/Diversified Ed 9-12 | ||
| 6 yr1 | Computer Education K-51 | ||
| 6 yr1 | Computer Ed/ Business Tech Ed 6-121 | ||
| 6 yr1 | Technology Education 6-121 | ||
| 2010-2011 | April 1, 2011 | 6 yr | Science K-12 |
| 6 yr | Agriscience & Natural Resources 6-12 | ||
| 4 yr | Speech/Drama/Journalism/Humanities | ||
| 2011-2012 | April 1, 2012 | 6 yr | Social Studies K-12 |
| 6 yr | Driver Education & Traffic Safety 9-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Physical Education K-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Health Education K-12 | ||
| 2012-2013 | April 1, 2013 | 6 yr2 | Computer Ed/ Business Tech Ed 6-122 |
| 6 yr2 | Computer Education K-52 | ||
| 6 yr2 | Technology Ed 6-122 | ||
| 6 yr | Industrial Ed 9-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Family & Consumer Sciences 6-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Health Sciences Education 6-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Visual Arts K-12 | ||
| 6 yr | World Languages K-12 | ||
| 2013-2014 | April 1, 2014 | 6 yr | Reading K-12 |
| 2014-2015 | April 1, 2015 | 6 yr | ESOL K-12 |
| 6 yr | Language Arts K-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Speech/Drama/Journalism/Humanities | ||
| 6 yr | Literature 6-12 | ||
| 6 yr | Music K-12 |
Idaho held a special review session in April to look at Evidence Based Intervention Math programs for meeting Idaho’s Math Initiative needs. Committee recommendations went to the State Board of Education in June. For information related to Idaho math Initiative: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/math/math_initiative.htm/.
As part of the Math Initiative, Idaho has incorporated National Council for Teachers of Mathematics criteria into our evaluation process. This evaluation tool ensure Idaho’s math materials align to the national standards as well as to our own state standards. This evaluation tool is available through our web page: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/evaluation_forms.htm.
In June, Idaho reviewed curricular materials in the content areas of Mathematics, Evidence Based Mathematics, Professional Technical Education, Language Arts Part I: Reading, and Research Based Reading. Annual adoption continues for Computer Applications and Limited English Proficiency. Our committee recommendations go before the State Board of Education in August.
Idaho continues to provide specific funding to school districts for purchasing curricular materials, applicable to both print and non-print state approved instructional materials. Idaho Legislators approved $9.95 million under House Bill No. 670, Section 6. The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall determine the formulas and methodologies for the distribution of funds based upon average daily attendance numbers. http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/classroom_enhancement/textbooks.htm
To meet Idaho Statute 33-118A, Idaho continues to move toward housing electronic versions of textbooks versus print editions at the State Department of Education’s Curriculum & Technology Center. Publishers will be asked to submit electronic editions when available.. Print editions will continue to be required for the review process and for each of our seven regional centers.
In 2009 Idaho will be reviewing Drivers Education, Physical Education, Health, and Humanities in the categories of Interdisciplinary, World Languages, Dance, Music, Drama/Theatre, and Art. Our adoption schedule is available: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/cm_docs/adoptionschedule.pdf. Standards for drivers education and humanities are currently under revision. The revised standards should be available after the first of the year.
Our caravan continues to be in October. For dates and additional information, please refer to our website: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/cm_docs/caravan.pdf.
Idaho’s Curricular materials homepage: http://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/ contains a listing of all state approved curricular materials, adoption process statutes, upcoming events, adoption process deadlines as well as publisher contact information. Our website continues to be revised, please contact me if have difficulty in locating necessary information.
In Indiana we are in the middle of our Social Studies adoption. We are adopting in all areas for grades 1-12.
The publishers submitted their bids and samples on June 19. The state reviewers met earlier in July in Indianapolis and gave their recommendations to the Advisory Committee on Textbook Adoptions as to whether the books were satisfactory or unsatisfactory for adoption. The advisors will consider their recommendations and receive public input through our public hearings. They will then vote at their meeting on September 3 and the State Board of Education will approve their recommendations in the afternoon of September 3.
The textbook caravan will be held in January and February. Our caravan is planned by the publishers and visits about 9 sites around the state. Publishers whose material is not on the adoption list may attend the caravan and display their material, but they are not given a presentation time.
Our next adoption area is Mathematics. The bids and samples for the social studies materials will be due around June 18, 2009. As a reminder to publishers, we accept final copy only.
As far as funding, Indiana is a textbook rental state. This means that the parents of the students pay a "textbook rental fee" each year and we have no state funding for textbooks except for children on the free and reduced lunch program.
| I. | Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption: 2007-2008 Reading & Literature | ||||
| A. | Caravan participation has continued to increase annually since 2002 (Language Arts, 638 registered). This year for Reading/Literature, 2,100 were registered. | ||||
| B. | Estimated cost of books LEAs’ purchased: At least $45 million (Reading $25,700,00 and Literature $20,000,000) | ||||
| II. | Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption | ||||
| A. | 2008-2009 Language Arts | ||||
| B. | 2009-2010 Career and Technical Education | ||||
| i. | Categories /Subjects for adoption | ||||
| a. Agriscience | |||||
| b. Business Education | |||||
| c. Marketing | |||||
| d. Family and Consumer Sciences | |||||
| e. Health Occupations | |||||
| f. Technology Education | |||||
| g. Trade & Industrial | |||||
| III. | Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials | ||||
| A. | Public Schools: We do not have a per-pupil allocation for the public schools. The State and local funding for approved textbooks is generated through the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) funding formula. The formula determines the minimum cost of total operational expenditures for each school system. Districts receive the state board's share as part of a monthly allotment with provision for local flexibility that allows funds to be used as deemed appropriate by school systems. | ||||
| B. | Nonpublic Schools: Each nonpublic school receives a textbook allocation based on the number of K-12 nonpublic students enrolled in the SBESE and Brumfield-Dodd approved nonpublic schools. Reimbursements made to local school districts for purchases of nonsectarian books for nonpublic school students at the rate of $27.02 per student. | ||||
| IV. | Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year | ||||
| A. | State Superintendent Paul G. Pastorek’s focus is preparing Louisiana’s children to succeed and compete on a national as well as international level during the 21st century. | ||||
| B. | Our Vision is to create a world-class education system for all students in Louisiana. To achieve this vision, the Superintendent is focusing state efforts on these 3 missions and 5 initiatives: | ||||
Missions:
| |||||
Initiatives:
| |||||
| C. | Realignment at the Department | ||||
| i. | We have been assigned to a new division: Division of Curriculum Standards. (We will actually be working in the same division with content staff.) | ||||
| ii. | The Division Director is Nancy Beben. | ||||
| iii. | The Division is composed of three sections: Ancillary Resources Section, Elementary Standards (PreK-4), and Secondary Standards (5-12). | ||||
| D. | Special call for K-12 Reading Intervention Programs Recommended List | ||||
| i. | Currently in Bulletin 1903, Regulations and Guidelines for Implementation of the Louisiana Law for the Education of Dyslexic Students, Louisiana has a recommended list of Multisensory Structured Language Programs for Students identified with Characteristics of Dyslexia. | ||||
| ii. | The Department has established a task force that is currently revising the bulletin and is making plans to review intervention, remediation, and assessment products with the expectation of updating this recommended list. The task force intends to announce a special call for these programs. Publishers who are interested in being included in any invitation should send an email to the Textbooks Staff. | ||||
| E. | New Bid Submission System - We have implemented a new ftp (File Transfer Protocol) system for bid submissions. It is helpful because the documents were overloading our email systems. This system houses the electronic files pertaining to bids, affidavits, correlations, and forms Bs’, and provides easy, ongoing access to our staff as well as the publishers. | ||||
| F. | Book Depository Status | ||||
| i. | In May we anticipate announcing an RFP for the state Book Depository, which will serve in a Preferred Status. | ||||
| ii. | Our policy allows districts to purchase from the Book Depository or directly from the publishers. | ||||
| iii. | We are the process of expanding the current ordering system to include a new feature which will include alternate text formats, thereby providing districts with a single point of entry for ordering all student materials. This provision is now in development stages in the current depository agreement. | ||||
| iv. | The new RFP will include these new features and specifications, which will provide for a state-of-the-art, state-wide, centralized ordering system to include alternate text formats (i.e. Braille, Audio, Large Print, and Digital). | ||||
| G. | Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) Consortium/Project. | ||||
| i. | The Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) Consortium is comprised of 15 States that are committed to organizational restructuring to increase the quality, availability, and timeliness of accessible educational materials. The Consortium, coordinated by CAST, consists of Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. | ||||
| ii. | The primary goal of the AIM Consortium is to improve academic outcomes for elementary and secondary school students with disabilities, focusing on the key element of timely and appropriate access to instructional materials for students with print disabilities. | ||||
| iii. | AIM Period of Performance: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2009 | ||||
| iv. | Focused State Activities budget is $ 166,666.00, and Louisiana’s goals are: | ||||
| 1. Develop data management and tracking systems for administering NIMAS files and delivering instructional materials in accessible formats. | |||||
| 2. Develop and implement a plan for providing professional development designed to improve the capacity of LEAs to understand the provisions of Section 300.172 of Part B of IDEA 2004; identify students with print disabilities; determine which specialized formats and technology tools are appropriate for student with print disabilities; and acquire specialized formats and supporting tools to students with print disabilities. | |||||
| 3. Improve States' communications regarding accessible instructional materials and NIMAS by developing talking points and a core message for sharing with others. | |||||
| V. | Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials | ||||
| A. | We are in the process of proposing language which would revise Bulletin 1794- State Textbook Adoption Policy & Procedure Manual regarding Free Materials. All Free Materials, Ancillary, and Basal materials will be limited to instructional materials. Instructional Materials are limited to items having intellectual content that by design assist in the instruction of a subject or course. Instructional Materials may be transmitted via “storage mechanisms” (such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, flash drives, etc.), but “delivery mechanisms” (such as iPods, laptops, whiteboards, etc.) shall not be included in the adopted materials. Instructional Materials may be available in bound, unbound, bundled or package form and may consist of hardbound or softbound textbooks, consumables, manipulatives, electronic media, and computer courseware or software. Instructional Materials do not include electronic or computer hardware even if such hardware is bundled with software or other electronic media, nor does it include equipment or supplies. We plan to bring these recommended revisions to the State Board meeting in August. | ||||
| V. | Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any) | ||||
| The State K-12 Textbook Adoption Cycle | ||
| 2010-2011: Science , Health and Physical Education & Computer Education | 2011-2012: Foreign Language, Handwriting, Music & Fine Arts | 2012-2013: Mathematics |

I. Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)MISSISSIPPI
The Mississippi Department of Education reserves the right to make changes.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Adoption Schedule | Request for Proposal | Historic Adoption Year |
| Career Tech, Adult Basic and Driver Ed | December 2006 | August 1, 2007 |
| 9-12 Language Arts/Reading, CORE Reading Intervention, Modern, Classical and Native Languages | August 2007 | August 1, 2008 |
| K-8 Language Arts/Reading, CORE Reading Intervention, Modern, Classical and Native Languages | August 2008 | 2009 |
| Social Studies, Library/Reference, NM Native American Art and Culture | August 2009 | 2010 |
| Science, Health, and Physical Education | August 2010 | 2011 |
| Mathematics and the Arts (Music, Theatre, Dance, Art) | August 2011 | 2012 |
Last year, Oklahoma adopted Reading and Literature, K-12.
II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
Currently, the State Textbook Committee is reviewing materials for Foreign Languages, Health, Vocational Education, Computer Education, Instructional Technology, and Personal Financial Literacy. Next year, the State Textbook Committee will consider bids in K-12 Mathematics.
III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
The allocation for the Reading and Literature adoption was $33,000,000, which is about $55 per student. Because of the budget shortfalls due to less than expected lottery income, and high fuel and operating costs, this amount does not reflect an increase from previous years.
IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
Funding is, as always, the biggest problem we have faced this year.
V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
Our policy has changed regarding instructional materials descriptions in the bid. For example, if a company bids materials in kit form, they must be very specific about everything contained in that kit. If a kit contains manipulatives, the bid should not just state “manipulatives” as the description. The State Textbook Committee wants to know specifically what manipulatives are in the kit, and how many of each type there are. This will be tedious for the contract representatives, but it will aid us in assuring that there are no omissions from, nor additions to the final bid. Once the bids arrive in my office, I will work with publishers to ensure that all bids are sufficient. If something is not clear, I will require that the company correct the bid form before the final vote in November.
Another change is that correlations may now be submitted in electronic format only. Publishers may either provide access to the correlations via the Internet, or they may send a CD-rom containing the correlations.
V. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)
None.
In October 2007 the Oregon State Board of Education adopted Health Education and Physical Education Instructional Materials. The process followed traditional procedures set forth by statute and administrative rule.
II. Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
Instructional materials criteria have been developed for the evaluation of ‘K-8 Mathematics’ this summer with proposed adoption in October resulting in the district adoption, purchase and disbursement to classrooms by September 2009.
III. Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials
In 2007 Oregon’s Governor and Legislature made education funding a priority and in addition to approving the proposed education budget, provided millions in school improvement funding tied to key performance measures for education. While districts are not required by law to earmark money for instructional materials many school districts do because they are required by law to annually adopt materials from the state approved list, independently adopt using the same criteria and process or postpone the adoption for up to one year. Department staff have participated in some state-wide review and audits of district standards, including instructional materials adoption, along side monitoring visits required by No Child Left Behind.
IV. Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year
With the retirement of Ray Lindley, past ODE Director and NASTA President, some institutional knowledge has been lost. However, the staff transition has been supported by Sue Parton who continues to handle bids, contracts, and facility planning and Jerry Rockwood from the Northwest Textbook Depository. The postponement secondary mathematics standards, implementation of core standards, minor issues regarding the state viewing site and the lack of an official caravan for health and physical education materials created challenges this past year but it is our pleasure to report to you that Oregon’s process is strong.
V. Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials
Ray will continue to support efforts to revise existing administrative rules and procedures to continue streamlining Oregon’s process. This will include proposed changes to the provisions for the adoption of criteria and materials by reference instead of annual changes to the law and efforts to strengthen the review process, substitution policies and technical standards to facilitate the involvement of both print and digital publishers.
VI. Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any)
As mentioned above, in January Oregon postponed the adoption of standards and materials for ‘Secondary Mathematics’ so those materials will be bid, evaluated, and adopted in 2008-09 with ‘K-12 Science’ materials. Additional science and math requirements imbedded in the New Oregon Diploma have created a great amount of interest in secondary mathematics and science. New K-12 Science and Secondary Math standards are already under review and drafts are available at the Department web page http://www.ode.state.or.us/go/InstructionalMaterials.
~ ~ ~ ~
South Carolina
Submitted
by
Kriss Stewart
SC Instructional Materials Adoption Program
| I. | Subject Areas of Last Year's Adoption 2007 Adoption Cycle Business, Management, and Administration
Education and Training
|
| II. | Subject Areas of Current/Next Year's Adoption
2008 Adoption Cycle Business, Management, and Administration
|
| III. | Allocation/Funding for Instructional Materials General Fund $26,498,804 EIA Fund $21,923,259 Non-Recurring $3,331,413 |
| IV. | Challenges/Issues You Have Faced This Year The most challenging part of the current adoption is funding materials for the 2008–09 school year. The General Assembly appropriates funds from the General Funds and Education Improvement Act (EIA) which enables the State Department of Education to fund instructional materials by subject areas from the current adoption. This year the school orders for materials have exceeded the General Fund and EIA by at least eight million. In addition, Non-Recurring funds will not be available until November 2008. |
| V. | Significant Legislative or Policy Changes/Issues Affecting Instructional Materials At the request of the State Board of Education, the Department is reviewing the time line of instructional materials adoption procedures and events and will make changes as needed. |
| VI. | Future Subject Areas of Adoption/Changes to Cycle (if any) Tentative Adoption Areas for 2009 Cycle AP Computer Science Business Administration Major
Language Arts, K–5 Mathematics, 9–12
Science, 9–12
|